ISCRAM Digital Library
Home
|
Show All
|
Simple Search
|
Advanced Search
Login
Quick Search:
Field:
main fields
author
title
publication
keywords
abstract
area
conference
contains:
...
1–1 of 1 record found matching your query (
RSS
):
Search & Display Options
Search within Results:
Field:
author
title
year
keywords
abstract
type
publication
abbrev_journal
volume
issue
pages
thesis
publisher
place
editor
series_title
language
area
notes
call_number
serial
contains:
...
Exclude matches
Display Options:
Field:
all fields
keywords & abstract
additional fields
records per page
Select All
Deselect All
<<
1
>>
List View
|
Citations
|
Details
Record
Links
Author
Diana Contreras
;
Thomas Blaschke
;
Stefan Kienberger
;
Peter Zeil
Title
Spatial vulnerability indicators: Measuring recovery processes after earthquakes
Type
Conference Article
Year
2011
Publication
8th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management: From Early-Warning Systems to Preparedness and Training, ISCRAM 2011
Abbreviated Journal
ISCRAM 2011
Volume
Issue
Pages
Keywords
Earthquakes
;
Indicators (instruments)
;
Information systems
;
Common features
;
Post disasters
;
Recovery process
;
Spatial
;
Spatial context
;
Spatial variables
;
Vulnerability
;
Vulnerability indicators
;
Recovery
Abstract
In order to analyze and evaluate any post-disaster phases it is necessary to address the pre-existent vulnerability conditions. The methodology consists of four steps: the first step comprises of a review of vulnerability and recovery indicators; the second step is to identify indicators based on spatial variables; the third step is to find the common variables among the subsets of spatial variables from vulnerability and recovery indicators; and the fourth step more pragmatic, is an investigation of the availability of data. The initial results are the set of vulnerability and recovery indicators. Reducing the set of indicators to the indicators represented in a spatial context and the indicators with common features of vulnerability and recovery indices bears the risk to ignore some important single indicators; nevertheless, the added value of the on-going research is to show the advantages of using indicators based on spatial variables.
Address
Centre for Geoinformatics Z-GIS, University of Salzburg, Austria
Corporate Author
Thesis
Publisher
Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, ISCRAM
Place of Publication
Lisbon
Editor
M.A. Santos, L. Sousa, E. Portela
Language
English
Summary Language
English
Original Title
Series Editor
Series Title
Abbreviated Series Title
Series Volume
Series Issue
Edition
ISSN
2411-3387
ISBN
9789724922478
Medium
Track
Planning and Foresight
Expedition
Conference
8th International ISCRAM Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management
Notes
Approved
no
Call Number
Serial
413
Share this record to Facebook
Select All
Deselect All
<<
1
>>
List View
|
Citations
|
Details
Home
CQL Search
|
Library Search
|
Show Record
|
Extract Citations
Help